Bloom et al v. Pro-Maxima Manufacturing Company et al
| 6:2005cv06735 |
| December 21, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Marian W. Payson |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
202
CORRECTED DECISION AND ORDER re 188 MOTION voluntarily discontinuance of cross-claim for indemnification pursuant to Rule 41 filed by M-F Athletic Company, Inc., 195 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, 183 MOTION for Summary Judgment Dismissing Cross-Claims of M-F Athletic Company filed by ProMaxima Manufacturing, Ltd. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/4/2011. This Decision and Order corrects a typographical error on page seven of the original Decision and Order.(MWP)
|
|
Filing
195
DECISION AND ORDER granting 183 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 188 Motion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for ProMaxima against M-F Athletic on the latters claims for contribution and for indemnification. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/28/10. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
182
DECISION AND ORDER denying 167 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 167 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 4/15/10. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
98
DECISION AND ORDER granting 63 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 64 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 69 Motion ; granting 79 Motion in Limine. Woodcliffs motion (Docket No. 63) for summary judgment is granted and the Clerk is d irected to enter judgment for Woodcliff and terminate Woodcliff as a party. M-F Athletics motion (Docket No. 64) for partial summary judgment on its indemnification claim against ProMaxima and preclusion of expert testimony is denied. ProMaximas moti on (Docket No. 69) to preclude testimony by Plaintiffs expert, Pittman, is denied. Plaintiffs cross-motion (Docket No. 79) to preclude testimony by ProMaximas expert, Cosgrove, and to preclude a portion of the testimony by M-F Athletics expert, Schwalje, that any danger in the Roman chair was open and obvious, is granted.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 11/9/09. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bloom et al v. Pro-Maxima Manufacturing Company et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
