Jackson v. Goord et al
| 6:2006cv06172 |
| March 27, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
DECISION AND ORDER denying 60 Motion to Vacate. Plaintiffs motion [#60] is denied. The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/4/14. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
57
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 50 Motion to Dismiss; granting 54 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 2/3/14. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
48
DECISION AND ORDER denying 45 Motion for Extension of Time to File; denying 46 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b); denying 47 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court will issue a separate order scheduling the matter for trial.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 4/10/13. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
42
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants summary judgment motion [#27] is granted in part and denied in part, as follows: It is denied as to the ret aliation claim against Conway, James, and Norcross, and is otherwise granted. Plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment [#37] is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate Goord, Kennedy, Dougherty, Roach, Monin, and Woods as parties to this action. The retaliation claim against Conway, James and Norcross may go forward.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/11/11. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
41
DECISION AND ORDER denying 40 Motion to Disqualify Judge; denying 40 Motion for Reconsideration re 40 MOTION to Disqualify Judge MOTION for Reconsideration re 39 Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Nahshon Jackson. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/22/11. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
39
DECISION AND ORDER denying 38 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/4/11. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Goord et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
