Parsons v. Artus

Parsons v. Artus

Case Number:	6:2006cv06462
Filed:	September 13, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
Presiding Judge:	David G. Larimer
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 21, 2020	Filing 48 DECISION AND ORDER re 23 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andre Parsons, Sr.. The request for a writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the Amended Petition (ECF No. 23) is dismissed. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial s howing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/21/20. CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO MAIL A COPY OF THIS NEF AND ORDER TO PRO SE PETITIONER AT ELMIRA(KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Date Filed

Document Text

May 21, 2020

Filing 48 DECISION AND ORDER re 23 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Andre Parsons, Sr.. The request for a writ of habeas corpus is denied, and the Amended Petition (ECF No. 23) is dismissed. Because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial s howing of the denial of a constitutional right, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/21/20. CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO MAIL A COPY OF THIS NEF AND ORDER TO PRO SE PETITIONER AT ELMIRA(KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parsons v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?