Abeln v. Ultra Life Batteries, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Abeln
Defendant: Ultra Life Batteries, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2007cv06113
Filed: February 23, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Wayne
Presiding Judge: David G. Larimer
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 Job Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER granting defendant's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/30/09. (EMA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abeln v. Ultra Life Batteries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ultra Life Batteries, Inc.
Represented By: Jill K. Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Abeln
Represented By: Christina A. Agola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?