Johnson et al v. The University of Rochester Medical Center et al
| Keith Johnson and Laura Schmidt |
| The University of Rochester Medical Center and Strong Memorial Hospital |
| 6:2007cv06149 |
| February 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| David G. Larimer |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER granting defendants' 26 Motion for Sanctions and plaintiffs counsel is ordered to personally remit to defendants the sum of $8,399.00, within ten days of entry of this Order. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/3/10. (EMA)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER re 26 First MOTION for Sanctions filed by Strong Memorial Hospital, The University of Rochester Medical Center. Responses due by 4/12/2010. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/12/10. (PR)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting defendants' motion to dismiss 14 , and dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff Johnsons motion to amend the complaint 18 is denied as frivolous and in bad faith. Defendants' request for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 11 is denied, without prejudice to defendants' right to bring a separate motion seeking such relief. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 2/18/10. (EMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
