Lunts et al v. Rochester City School District et al
| Ellen Lunts and Alexander Lunts |
| Rochester City School District, SUNY Empire State College and State University of New York (SUNY) |
| 6:2007cv06272 |
| May 30, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
143
ORDER granting 130 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 131 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 9/13/2011. (BMB)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER that Mr. Benitez shall re-submit to the Court a valid privilege log with the above referenced missing information by 1/31/2011, if defense counsel fails to provide this Court ordered privilege log by 1/31/2011 defendant shall be required to produce the information alleged to be privileged for failure to submit a valid privilege log. ( Response due by 1/31/2011.). Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 1/12/2011. (TO)
|
|
Filing
126
ORDER granting 84 Motion for Sanctions; denying 110 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 11/30/2010. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 9/28/2010. (TO)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER denying 36 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 04/02/2009. (BMB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
