Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority v. Hynes-Cherin et al
| Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority |
| Brigid Hynes-Cherin and Federal Transit Administration |
| 6:2007cv06378 |
| August 2, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting Motions 3 12to intervene. Intervenors shall file their responses to plaintiff's motion to stay 6 no later than 12:00 noon on August 23, 2007. Absent a stipulation by all the parties extending intervenors' time to answer, intervenors shall answer or otherwise move with respect to the complaint within twenty (20) days after the date of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge David G. Larimer on 8/22/07. (EMA)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER re 6 First MOTION to Stay filed by Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation Authority. FTA Responses due by 8/21/2007. Motion Hearing set for 8/27/2007 02:00 PM before Hon. David G. Larimer. FTA and plaintiff must respond to Laidlaw Transit, Inc. motion to intervene 10, if at all, by 8/20/07. Because the school year commences during the first week of September 2007, the only issue before the Court is the stay. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 8/14/07. (EMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
