Sims v. Wegmans Food Markets Inc. et al
| Elijah Sims |
| Wegmans Food Markets Inc., Teamsters Local Union 118, Division of Human Rights and (EEOC) U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
| 6:2007cv06525 |
| April 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Monroe |
| David G. Larimer |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER that a hearing on the issue of whether Wegmans was properly served with the complaint in this matter will be scheduled forthwith. The parties are instructed that, at least 14 days prior to the hearing date, they shall file with the Court a lis t of the witnesses that each plans to produce at the hearing, and a summary of their expected testimony, as well as copies of any documentary evidence each party intends to use at the hearing. Plaintiff is specifically advised that failure to produc e Monroe County Sheriffs Deputy Lyle Hibbard, signatory to the Affidavit of Service upon which plaintiff relies, will seriously jeopardize plaintiffs ability to demonstrate proper service on Wegmans, and may result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment 28 is denied, without prejudice. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 7/1/09. (EMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
