Industrial Technology Ventures, L.P. v. Pleasant T. Rowland Revocable Trust et al
| Industrial Technology Ventures, L.P. |
| Pleasant T. Rowland Revocable Trust, W. Jerome Frautschi Living Trust, W. Jerome Frautschi and Diane C. Creel |
| 6:2008cv06227 |
| May 27, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Monroe |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
DECISION AND ORDER denying 134 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 136 Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 138 Motion for Summary Judgment consistent with this Decision and Order. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 4/28/15. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
120
DECISION AND ORDER denying 96 Motion for Sanctions; granting 111 Motion for Sanctions; granting 112 Motion for Leave to File. ITVs motion for leave to file a sur-reply memorandum of law, Feb. 6, 2012, ECF No. 112, is granted. Defendants Joint M otion for Sanctions, Dec. 2, 2011, ECF No. 96, is denied. ITVs cross-motion for sanctions, Feb 6, 2012, ECF No. 111, is granted, with sanctions imposed as indicated above. ITV shall have until March 15, 2012, to file papers in support of an award of attorneys fees and costs, and Defendants shall have until March 29, 2012, to file responsive papers. The Court will thereafter issue an Order containing the amount allowed for attorneys fees and costs. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/6/12. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
113
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's motion to substitute an exhibit 84 and its motion to amend its complaint 62 are granted, with the exception of paragraph 111 concerning a communication between Frautschi and Wilson. Within seven (7) days of the date of this decision, plaintiff shall serve and file the Second Amended Complaint. Within seven (7) days of service of the Second Amended Complaint, the parties shall submit a joint proposed amended scheduling order. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 2/17/2012. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
35
DECISION AND ORDER denying 5 Motion to Dismiss; denying 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss.Creels motion to dismiss Count V alleging unjust enrichment against her is granted and otherwise, Defendants motions to dismiss (Docket Nos. 5, 7 & 10) are denied. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 2/23/10. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
