Boyde v. Monroe County et al
| 6:2008cv06242 |
| June 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 156 Motion for Summary Judgment.. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for French and to terminate him as a party to this action.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/8/13. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
135
DECISION AND ORDER denying 88 Motion. Defendants motion to preclude the Note is denied, but the Court will permit Defendants to conduct additional discovery concerning the Note. In that regard, Defendants are to notify the Court by letter within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Decision and Order on what further discovery is requested, as well as the date by which any requested discovery would be completed.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/22/11. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER granting 73 Motion to Appoint Counsel Appointed Jeffrey J. Harradine for Thomas W. Boyde, IV pro bono. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 7/19/2010. (TO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boyde v. Monroe County et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
