Merges et al v. Aramark Corporation et al
David R. Merges and Julie L. Merges |
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Management Services Limited Partnership |
6:2008cv06250 |
June 9, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
P.I.: Other Office |
Ontario |
David G. Larimer |
Marian W. Payson |
Defendant |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 80 ORDER that at the joint request of the parties, the Court orders bifurcation of this trial pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(b) to expedite and economize the proceedings. The Court will conduct a jury trial on issues of liability only commencing 12/2/13 . Pretrial is now scheduled for 11/18/13 at 2:00 p.m. Depending on the jury's determination as to liability, the Court schedules trial on the damage issues for 1/6/14. The previously scheduled trial date and pretrial conference dates are vacated in favor of this order. All other requirements set forth in the Court's original Pretrial Order 75 entered 6/28/13 remain in full force and effect.. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 8/1/13. (EMA) |
Filing 75 PRETRIAL ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/25/2013 02:00 PM before Hon. David G. Larimer. Jury Trial set for 12/9/2013 08:30 AM before Hon. David G. Larimer. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 6/28/13. (EMA) |
Filing 52 ORDER denying 32 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 3/30/2012. (RJO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.