Moore v. Conway

Moore v. Conway

Petitioner:	Melvin Moore
Respondent:	James T. Conway
Case Number:	6:2008cv06390
Filed:	September 2, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Livingston
Presiding Judge:	Jonathan W. Feldman
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 20, 2010	Filing 28 DECISION AND ORDER denying petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 10/20/10. (JMC)
November 10, 2009	Filing 20 DECISION AND ORDER finding as moot 7 Motion to Stay; granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 16 Motion. Petitioners motion to stay [#7] is denied as moot, and Petitioners motion [#16] for an extension of time to file a traverse/reply, and for permission to file a forty-five page brief, is granted nunc pro tunc. Additionally, Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in writing, on or before December 11, 2009, the following: 1) Whether the proposed claims for ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel are timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), and if not, whether they relate back to the filing of the original petition under FRCP 15(c); and 2) whether the claim for ineffective assistance of trail counsel was exhausted in state court.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 11/10/09. (KAP)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 20, 2010

Filing 28 DECISION AND ORDER denying petition for writ of habeas corpus and dismissing the petition. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 10/20/10. (JMC)

November 10, 2009

Filing 20 DECISION AND ORDER finding as moot 7 Motion to Stay; granting 16 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; granting 16 Motion. Petitioners motion to stay [#7] is denied as moot, and Petitioners motion [#16] for an extension of time to file a traverse/reply, and for permission to file a forty-five page brief, is granted nunc pro tunc. Additionally, Petitioner is ordered to show cause, in writing, on or before December 11, 2009, the following: 1) Whether the proposed claims for ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel are timely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), and if not, whether they relate back to the filing of the original petition under FRCP 15(c); and 2) whether the claim for ineffective assistance of trail counsel was exhausted in state court.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 11/10/09. (KAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Conway
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Melvin Moore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: James T. Conway
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?