Aet Rail Group, LLC v. Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Aet Rail Group, LLC v. Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.

Aet Rail Group, LLC v. Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Aet Rail Group, LLC
Defendant:	Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2008cv06442
Filed:	September 26, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Contract: Other Office
County:	Livingston
Presiding Judge:	Marian W. Payson
Presiding Judge:	Michael A. Telesca
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Diversity
Jury Demanded By:	28:1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 30, 2010	Filing 50 DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 AET's Motion to Compel. All responsive documents shall be provided to AET by 7/23/2010. Court finds that an award of attorneys' fees to AET is justified. Counsel for AET to submit t o Court an affidavit specifying his fees and costs, including his hourly rate and the number of hours devoted to the instant motion, along with corresponding time and billing records by 7/14/2010. Counsel for Siemens may file any objections to the requested fees and costs by 7/23/2010; denying 42 Siemens' Cross-Motion. Counsel directed to confer and submit to the Court a joint proposed amended scheduling order by 7/23/2010. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 6/30/2010. (KAH)
December 30, 2009	Filing 46 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Withdraw ; denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on December 30, 2009. (Herrero-Jaarsma, Maria)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 30, 2010

Filing 50 DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 AET's Motion to Compel. All responsive documents shall be provided to AET by 7/23/2010. Court finds that an award of attorneys' fees to AET is justified. Counsel for AET to submit t o Court an affidavit specifying his fees and costs, including his hourly rate and the number of hours devoted to the instant motion, along with corresponding time and billing records by 7/14/2010. Counsel for Siemens may file any objections to the requested fees and costs by 7/23/2010; denying 42 Siemens' Cross-Motion. Counsel directed to confer and submit to the Court a joint proposed amended scheduling order by 7/23/2010. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 6/30/2010. (KAH)

December 30, 2009

Filing 46 ORDER granting 14 Motion to Withdraw ; denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on December 30, 2009. (Herrero-Jaarsma, Maria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aet Rail Group, LLC v. Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aet Rail Group, LLC
Represented By:	John O'Kelly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Siemens Transportation Systems, Inc.
Represented By:	Bryon L. Friedman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?