Bridgeforth v. Bartlett et al
| Otis Michael Bridgeforth |
| Bartlett, J. Colvin, J. Arnaldo, P. Amerson, J. Collins and W. Jordan |
| 6:2008cv06471 |
| October 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Chemung |
| Jonathan W. Feldman |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER granting defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint 9 , and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. Plaintiff's motion to adjourn the scheduling conference 17 , motion for miscellaneous relief 19 , and his motion for a Rule 16 conference 24 are denied as moot. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 2/17/10. (EMA)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER denying 4 Motion for interlocutory Summary Judgment, plaintiff has attached to his motion many copies of original documents, the clerk of the court is directed to file as of the date of the motion was filed, the documents attached to the moti on in a separate docket entry as exhibits in support of complaint. The clerk of the court is also directed to send plaintiff, with a copy of this order, the Pro Se Litigation Guidelines, to assist him in litigating his case under the FRCP.. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 1/22/09. (TO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
