Owens v. Aspen Funding LLC et al
Plaintiff: Louise Owens
Defendant: Aspen Funding LLC, Greenpoint Mortgage Funding LLC, GMAC and John Doe
Case Number: 6:2008cv06588
Filed: December 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 51 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion to Amend or Correct; granting 20 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss.GMACs motion [#20] to dismiss is granted, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate GMAC as a party to this action. Plaintiffs cross-motion to amend [#28] is granted in part and denied in part as follows: The application is granted to the extent that it adds Aurora as a necessary party, but is denied to th e extent that it seeks to assert any substantive claim against Aurora; the cross-motion is also denied insofar as it seeks to add GMAC and MERS as necessary parties. With this understanding, the Third Amended Complaint is now the operative pleading in this action. Greenpoints motion [#22] to dismiss is granted as to the following claims: 1) the claim for damages under TILA; 2) the claim under New York General Obligations Law § 5-501; 3) the claim under New York General Business Law § 349; 4) the claim for fraud; and 5) the claim for civil conspiracy to commit fraud. Greenpoints motion to dismiss is denied as to the following claims: 1) the TILA rescission claim; 2) the claim under New York Banking Law § 6-1; and 3) the claim for conversion of loan proceeds. Plaintiffs request to replead the dismissed claims against Greenpoint is denied. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/9/11. (KAP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Owens v. Aspen Funding LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Louise Owens
Represented By: Jane Gabriele
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aspen Funding LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greenpoint Mortgage Funding LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GMAC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?