United States of America v. $7,877.61 United States Currency
| United States of America |
| $7,877.61 United States Currency |
| 6:2009cv06306 |
| June 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| None |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
DECISION & ORDER The government's motion to dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 94 is granted, and the government's complaint is dismissed with prejudice, on the conditions that the govern ment certify to the Court on or before 9/27/2016, that it consents to dismissal with prejudice, and that the government pay to Bailey within ninety (90) days thereafter the amount of $7,877.61, subject to the offset requirements of the TOP and t he DCIA. If the government does not provide such certification, this motion to dismiss shall then be denied and the case will proceed to trial. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 9/20/2016. Copy of Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to claimant Harvey A. Bailey on 9/20/2016. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
92
DECISION & ORDER The government's motion for summary judgment 67 is denied. A trial date status conference will be held on 11/12/2015 at 11:00 AM before the Hon. Marian W. Payson. Arrangements will be made with the correctional facility for Bailey to participate by telephone. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 9/30/2015. Copy of Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to claimant Harvey A. Bailey on 9/30/2015. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
80
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's motion for an order striking the claim and answer of claimant 57 is denied without prejudice. (See Decision & Order for further instructions.) Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 3/20/2015. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
55
DECISION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 47 motion to compel and for an extension of the scheduling order. In the event that the government still wishes to extend the current scheduling order, the government is directed to confer with Bailey and submit a proposed amended scheduling order. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 3/25/2014. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
31
DECISION & ORDER denying without prejudice 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying without prejudice 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying without prejudice 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel. It is claimant's responsibility to retain an attorney or continue with this lawsuit prose. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 5/17/2012. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. $7,877.61 United States Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn L. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: $7,877.61 United States Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
