Casciani v. Town of Webster et al
| John Casciani |
| Town of Webster, Ronald Nesbitt and Donald Hauza |
| 6:2009cv06519 |
| October 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Marian W. Payson |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER denying without prejudice, defendants' 39 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is hereby directed to submit a new proposed amended complaint, limited to plaintiff's claim against defendant Hauza concerning the alleged delay in gran ting a building permit for one of plaintiff's properties. The proposed amended complaint must be submitted to the Court, and a copy served upon defendants, within 20 days after the date of issuance of this Decision and Order. Defendants shall file any objections or other response to the proposed amended complaint no later than 20 days after their receipt of the proposed amended complaint. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 3/5/13. (EMA)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER denying plaintiff's 59 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 12/11/12. (EMA)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting defendants' 12 16 Motion to Dismiss and dismissing the complaint. ***CLERK TO FOLLOW UP. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 10/4/11. (EMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
