Martin v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company

Plaintiff: Amanda D. Martin
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Case Number: 6:2009cv06617
Filed: December 4, 2009
Court: New York Western District Court
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Referring Judge: Jonathan W. Feldman
Presiding Judge: Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 16, 2011 33 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 24 Motion to Strike. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendant and close this case.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/15/11. (KAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda D. Martin
Represented By: Irving Pheterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.