Rosales v. Wright et al
Luis Rosales |
Lester N. Wright, Rita Grinbergs and Wesley K. Canfield |
6:2010cv06044 |
January 26, 2010 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Chemung |
David G. Larimer |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER granting 19 Motion to Dismiss by defendants P. Griffin, M. Sheaham, A. Bartlett, and W. Hopkins, and plaintiff's claims against those four defendants are dismissed. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 1/11/12. (EMA) |
Filing 11 DECISION AND ORDER granting (2 in 6:10-cv-06237-DGL) MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Luis Rosales. Case numbers 10-CV-6237 is consolidated into 10-CV-6044. Complaint filed in 10-CV-6237 is deemed a Supplemental Complaint in ca se number 10-CV-6044. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close case number 10-CV-6237. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order filed in action 10-CV-6237 will be decided with filed #3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order in case number 10-CV-604 4. The Clerk is directed to serve copies of the Summons, Supplemental Complaint and copy of this Order regarding the plaintiff's claims of additional retaliation upon defendants Griffin, Sheaham, Barlett and Hopkins. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 5/12/10. (RE) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying plaintiff's 7 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 4/9/10. (EMA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.