Coene et al v. 3M Company et al
Plaintiff: Robert Coene and Valerie Coene
Defendant: 3M Company, DTM Corporation, Valimet, Inc., Potters Industries, Inc. and Arkema, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2010cv06546
Filed: September 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 158 DECISION AND ORDER: 3M's motion for summary judgment 152 is DENIED. The parties are directed to appear before the Court on April 10, 2017 at 2:30 PM for a status conference to set a trial date. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 03/20/2017. (ZS)
January 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 157 DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to reimburse defendant the sum of $3,444 in attorneys' fees by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 1/5/2017. (KAH)
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 146 DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 68 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying with prejudice 71 Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying as moot 82 Plaintiffs' Amended No tice of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Negligence Per Se; denying as moot 94 Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Summary Judgment Evidence; denying as moot 110 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Contest One Additional Fact as Untrue and to Supplement the Summary Judgment Record; and denying 133 Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 09/25/2015. (ST)
September 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 145 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION & ORDER Plaintiffs' motions for a proposed scheduling order 123 and to quash 127 are denied. Plaintiffs' motion for a status conference 121 is denied without prejudice as moot. Plaintiffs' motion to seal 134 is granted, and Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5 ([133-4], [133-5], [133-6] and [133-7]) shall be sealed until further Order of this Court. 3M's request to seal certain documents 135 is granted, and Exhibits 1 and 6 ([133-3] and [133-8]) s hall be sealed until further Order of this Court. That portion of 3M's motion 135 seeking expedited relief is denied as moot, and that portion of 3M's motion 135 seeking sanctions is granted. (See contents of Decision & Order for details.). Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 9/16/2015. (KAH)
September 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 122 DECISION & ORDER (3M's motions to strike the Second Meggs Report and Coene's sur replies 62 , 84 are denied, although Coene shall be required to bear any expert fees and costs associated with discovery relating to the Second Meggs Report . Further, Coene's motions for sanctions and to extend the dispositive motion deadline 63 , 103 are denied. Finally, Coene's motion to preclude Whysner as an expert 77 is granted in part and denied in part.) See Decision & Order for specific deadlines. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 9/11/2014. (KAH)
August 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 DECISION AND ORDER denying 5 defendant Arkema's Motion to Dismiss; denying 6 defendant Potters'Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 8/10/11. (KAP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coene et al v. 3M Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Coene
Represented By: Kenneth F. McCallion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valerie Coene
Represented By: Kenneth F. McCallion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DTM Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Valimet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Potters Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arkema, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?