Edwards v. Rochester Institute of Technology et al
| Sharon Edwards |
| Rochester Institute of Technology and Donald Boyd |
| 6:2010cv06553 |
| September 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| David G. Larimer |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
213
DECISION AND ORDER denying 199 Motion for Reconsideration. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/18/2018. (AFM)
|
|
Filing
197
DECISION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 132 is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint 93 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/28/2018. (AFM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
94
DECISION AND ORDER granting 72 Motion to Stay. The stay granted herein shall remain in effect until the completion of the discovery process permitted by the Order of the Magistrate Judge. Within 30 days of the close of discovery, both parties shal l submit any changes or additions to the papers previously filed in stayed summary judgment proceedings. Upon receipt of all submissions, the Court will determine whether oral arguments will be necessary and notify the parties, accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 09/26/2013. (ST)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
