Washington v. Afify et al
| Anthony Washington |
| M. Afify, David Napoli, J. Colvin, K. McCarthy, Donahue, B. Curren, Sepiol, Post, S. Evertts, S. Waters, R. Deming, W. Faucett, W. Hollenbeck, J. K. Moss, Jayne and Delaney |
| 6:2011cv06176 |
| April 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Dutchess |
| David G. Larimer |
| Marian W. Payson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's converted motion seeking to vacate the Clerk's award of costs 58 is hereby granted, and the Clerk's award of costs to defendants 57 is vacated in its entirety. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 5/13/2019. Copy of this Decision and Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Anthony Washington on 5/13/2019 to his address of record. (KAH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
30
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER granting defendants' 22 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing the complaint in its entirety, with prejudice. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 11/30/15. (EMA)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss. All of plaintiff's claims are dismissed, with the exception of his due process claim against defendant Donahue, and his First Amendment retaliation claims against defendants Evertts, Deming, Faucett, and Waters. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 9/3/13. (EMA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
