Raeman v. County of Ontario et al
| Brian Raeman |
| County of Ontario, Ontario County Sheriff Philip Povero, David C Tillman and Charles L Tomes, Jr |
| 6:2012cv06009 |
| January 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Ontario |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying 7 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants motion for summary judgment is denied. Defendants motion to dismiss is granted in part, and the f irst two causes of action, both plead under Federal law, are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (1990), the Court declines to exercise jurisdictio n over the remaining state law claims in the third and fourth causes of action, and those causes of action are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants on the first two causes of action with prejudice, and enter judgment on the third and fourth causes of action for Defendants without prejudice, and close this case.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/11/13. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
