Smith v. Donaher et al
Plaintiff: Sheawn Smith
Defendant: James L. Riotto, Maija Dixion, Stephen Miller, Gary Clark, Timothy Donaher, Wedade Abdallah, Jennifer Morgan, Harling, Francis A. Affronti and Leah R. Meruine
Case Number: 6:2012cv06035
Filed: January 18, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Marian W. Payson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER denying 29 Motion for Reconsideration re 29 MOTION for Reconsideration re 27 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, filed by Sheawn Smith, 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Ronald Harling, Patrick M. O'Flynn, John Lapira, 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Thomas A. Beilein, 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sheawn Smith, 18 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Sheawn Smith ; finding as moot 30 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; finding as moot 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment, ECF No. 15, is denied in its entir ety, Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 29, is denied, and Defendants' motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 14 & 16, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) are granted. Plaintiff failed to plead adequate facts to state a claim that plausibly entitles him to relief. The remaining motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 30, and motion to appoint counsel, ECF No. 18, are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for Defendants and close this case.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 6/10/13. (KAP)
October 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 DECISION AND ORDER denying 15 Motion for Default Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Defendant Beilein provide the Court, not later than November 1, 2012, with evidenced showing that his motion to dismiss, which he filed on August 3, 2012, was timely, and it is further ORDERED, that defendant Beilein's failure to provide the Court with evidence that his motion to dismiss was timely may result in an entry of a default.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/19/12. (KAP)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Donaher et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James L. Riotto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Maija Dixion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stephen Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Timothy Donaher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wedade Abdallah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Francis A. Affronti
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leah R. Meruine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheawn Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?