Lamb v. Money Transfer Systems, Inc.
Jack Lamb |
Money Transfer Systems, Inc. |
6:2012cv06584 |
October 29, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Monroe |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 13 Motion to Dismiss.Defendants motion to dismiss [#13] is granted, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 9/13/13. (KAP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lamb v. Money Transfer Systems, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jack Lamb | |
Represented By: | John T. Refermat |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Money Transfer Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Stephen J. Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.