Nescolarde v. Pinkowski

Nescolarde v. Pinkowski

Plaintiff:	Yahico Cuello Nescolarde
Defendant:	Micheal Pinkowski
Case Number:	6:2012cv06707
Filed:	December 28, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Monroe
Presiding Judge:	Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 3, 2016	Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment., Defendants motions, ECF No. 29 and ECF No. 30, for summary judgment on Plaintiffs firs t cause of action against SatisPie for discrimination are denied; Defendants motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs second cause of action for retaliation by SatisPie against plaintiff Molina, are granted; Defendants motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs third cause of action for discrimination by all defendants (both individual and corporate) under the New York Human Rights Law, are denied; and Defendants motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs fourth cause of action for retaliation against all defendants (both individual and corporate) under the New York Human Rights Law are granted.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/2/16. (KAP)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 3, 2016

Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion for Summary Judgment., Defendants motions, ECF No. 29 and ECF No. 30, for summary judgment on Plaintiffs firs t cause of action against SatisPie for discrimination are denied; Defendants motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs second cause of action for retaliation by SatisPie against plaintiff Molina, are granted; Defendants motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs third cause of action for discrimination by all defendants (both individual and corporate) under the New York Human Rights Law, are denied; and Defendants motions for summary judgment on Plaintiffs fourth cause of action for retaliation against all defendants (both individual and corporate) under the New York Human Rights Law are granted.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/2/16. (KAP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nescolarde v. Pinkowski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yahico Cuello Nescolarde
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Micheal Pinkowski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?