Patterson v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Patterson
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 6:2013cv06416
Filed: August 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER denying Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting the Commissioner's 11 Cross Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and dismissing the complaint, with prejudice. Signed by Hon. David G. Larimer on 7/29/14. (EMA)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wayne Patterson
Represented By: Kenneth R. Hiller
Represented By: Jaya Ann Shurtliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?