Iacovangelo v. Correctional Medical Care, Incorporated et al
Frank B. Iacovangelo |
Correctional Medical Care, Inc., Emre Umar, Registered Nurse T.A., Registered Nurse M., John/Jane Doe Number One, County of Monroe, Patrick M. O'Flynn, Ronald Harling, Deputy D.C., Deputy D., Deputy C.M. and Deputy B.B. |
6:2013cv06466 |
September 2, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Monroe |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ORDER approving wrongful death settlement and application for attorney's fees. Jurisdiction is retained over this matter to enforce the terms of the settlement.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 12/21/16. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 38 DECISION AND ORDER denying 34 Motion for Reconsideration re 34 MOTION for Reconsideration re 33 Judgment MOTION to Vacate 33 Judgment filed by Frank B. Iacovangelo ; denying 34 Motion to Vacate. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/22/15. (KAP) |
Filing 32 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 26 Motion. Plaintiffs cross-motion [#26] is granted, but Defendants application to dismiss [#16] is also granted in its entirety, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/2/14. (KAP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.