Ezeh v. McDonald
Christopher Ezeh |
VA Medical Center, Craig Howard, Patricia Lind, Donna Crouse, Robert Searle, Melody Christensen, Cathy Boylan, Claudi Dumitrescu, Edmund Flick, Pamula Royal, Ed Moeller, Maxanne R. Witkin, Thomas L. Maddux, James Jindra, Daniel Spillsbury, Frank Cullen, Geraldine Clark, John Batten, John Milewski, James Gilbert and William Burkhart |
6:2013cv06563 |
October 15, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Monroe |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 207 DECISION AND ORDER denying 183 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 189 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 206 Motion. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close the case. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 03/29/2019. (A copy of this Decision and Order was mailed to Plaintiff) (CDH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 169 ORDER granting 158 Motion for Discovery and for Sanctions. Plaintiff is hereby Ordered to pay $100 to defendant for the cost of the court reporter in attendance for the deposition on January 26, 2017 which plaintiff failed to attend without adequate, timely notice. Such payment must be made in the form of a certified check mailed to defense counsel within fourteen (14) days of this Order. Plaintiff is to appear for the completion of his deposition which will take place on November 7, 2017 at 1:00 p.m. in the courtroom of the undersigned at 100 State Street, Rochester NY 14614. Any party unable to attend this deposition must notify the Court in writing no later than October 20, 2017. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 09/20/2017. A copy of this Order has been mailed to pro se plaintiff Christopher Ezeh, 1097 North Goodman, Apt. 2-up, Rochester, NY 14609. (JKT) |
Filing 163 DECISION AND ORDER denying 162 Motion for Summary Judgment without prejudice. No party may file a motion for summary judgment until after the pending motion for sanctions is decided and without first seeking and obtaining leave of the Court. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 5/8/17. (JPL) (A copy of this Decision and Order has been mailed to Plaintiff) |
Filing 154 ORDER granting 145 Motion to Compel; granting 145 Motion to Amend or Correct; denying 147 Motion. Plaintiff's deposition will take place on January 26, 2017 at 1:00 P.M. in the courtroom of the undersigned. The parties will have use o f the courtroom until 5:00 P.M. The undersigned will be available for the duration should any issues arise. The Court's current Scheduling Order is hereby modified as follows: Fact Discovery shall be completed by March 1, 2017. Dispositive motions shall be filed before Judge Wolford no later than May 1, 2017. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 11/21/2016. A copy of this Decision and Order has been sent to Pro Se Plaintiff. (JKT) |
Filing 140 DECISION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations 136 and denying 109 Motion. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 3/30/2016. (A copy of this Decision and Order was mailed to Plaintiff on 3/30/2016). |
Filing 135 ORDER granting 107 Motion to Compel; granting 107 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion to Compel. Fact Discovery is extended to 6/30/2016, dispositive motions shall be filed by 7/23/2016. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 03/10/2016. A copy of this Order will be sent to Plaintiff. (JKT) |
Filing 133 LETTER ORDER denying Plaintiff's request for additional pages. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 11/20/2015. (CDH). |
Filing 87 DECISION AND ORDER denying 84 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 86 Motion to Strike. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 5/20/2015. (CDH) (copy of order mailed to plaintiff Christopher Ezeh). |
Filing 77 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 63 Motion; denying 65 Motion; denying 71 Motion. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend is granted in part and denied in part, as set forth in the Decision and Order. The Clerk's Office is directed to file Plaintiff's amended complaint. Defendant is directed to answer the amended complaint within 20 days of entry of this order. Plaintiff's motions for recusal are denied. Defendant's motion to enjoin Plaintiff from filing further motions without leave of the Court is denied. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 1/21/2015. (CDH) |
Filing 58 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER granting 14 Motion to Dismiss; granting 17 Motion to Amend or Correct; denying 29 Motion; denying 30 Motion; denying 23 Motion; granting 34 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; grant ing in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Dismiss; denying 42 Motion to Amend or Correct; denying 51 Motion to Amend or Correct. The Honorable Robert A. McDonald, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, is substituted as sole defendant as to all remaining claims. Secretary McDonald is ordered to serve an answer to the remaining allegations of the complaint within 20 days of entry of this Decision and Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption in this matter to reflect the substitution of Secretary McDonald as the sole defendant. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 09/29/2014. (CDH) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying 48 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 04/30/2014. (CDH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.