Agostini v. Backus et al
| Terrance Agostini |
| T. Backus, D. Victor and T. Will |
| 6:2014cv06188 |
| April 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Wyoming |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion [#42] for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The application is granted as to the alleged retaliation on December 10, 2013, but is denied as to the alleged retaliation on November 16, 2013. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 4/25/19. Copy of this decision and order and NEF mailed to pro se plaintiff at Attica. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
29
DECISION & ORDER denying without prejudice 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel. It is plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 10/2/2015. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Terrance Agostini on 10/2/2015. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
19
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 2 Motion for TRO; denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 4/9/15. (KAP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
