Boles v. Eastman Kodak Company
Plaintiff: Mildred Boles
Defendant: Eastman Kodak Company
Case Number: 6:2014cv06243
Filed: May 13, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Monroe
Presiding Judge: Frank P. Geraci
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 DECISION AND ORDER granting 5 Motion to Dismiss, with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 01/14/2015. Pro se Plaintiff is hereby being sent this NEF and docketed Decision and Order via the USPS. -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- (ST)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boles v. Eastman Kodak Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eastman Kodak Company
Represented By: Chad W. Flansburg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mildred Boles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?