King v. Wenderlich et al
Markus King |
Stephen Wenderlich, Albert Prack, Luis Tiuinghast, T. Robinson, Tenea, Jamie M. Lamanna, John Doe, Sean T. Kelly and Gary Bels |
6:2014cv06491 |
August 26, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Chemung |
Frank P. Geraci |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 DECISION AND ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 63 is GRANTED and Plaintiff's retaliation, denial of religious liberty, and due process claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Because all claims against Defendants Wenderl ich, Tanea, LaManna, Prack, Robinson, and John Doe have been dismissed, the Clerk of Court will terminate those Defendants as parties to this action.The parties are directed to appear on September 5, 2018 at 3:00PM to set a trial date for Plaintiff's remaining claims.SO ORDERED. A copy of this NEF and Decision and Order have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 8/8/2018. (AFM)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 26 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 17 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants are directed to file a responsive pleading within 21 days of this decision. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 09/07/2016. (ZS) A copy of this decision has been sent via US Mail to Plaintiff Markus King at UPSTATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Box 2001, Malone, NY 12953. |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.