Roberts v. Artus
Petitioner: Dion Roberts
Respondent: Dale A. Artus
Case Number: 6:2015cv06525
Filed: September 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office: Rochester Office
County: Wyoming
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Wolford
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 11 -CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-DECISION AND ORDER denying request for a writ of habeas corpus, dismissing the Petition, and denying a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 10/31/16. The Clerk of Court is requested to send a copy of this Decision and Order to the pro se petitioner. (AFB)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roberts v. Artus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dion Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dale A. Artus
Represented By: Donna Milling (e-service)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?