Buehlman v. Ide Pontiac Inc et al
| Jeff Buehlman |
| Ide Pontiac Inc and Ann Ide |
| 6:2015cv06745 |
| December 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Elizabeth A. Wolford |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1938 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
DECISION AND ORDER granting 56 Motion for Reconsideration and Decertification; denying 57 Motion for Summary Judgment and Final Certification. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 12/17/2018. (CDH)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
25
-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; and denying 21 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike as follows: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Plaintiff's FLSA and NYLL overtime claims is denied as to Ide Pontiac, Inc.; and is denied without prejudice with leave to renew as to Anne Ide. Plaintiff's FLSA and NYLL overtime claims against Ide and Anne Ide remain pending. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Plaintiff's spread of hours claim under the NYLL is granted, and this claim is dismissed; and Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption so that the first name of the individual defendant is spelled "Anne" instead of "Ann." Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 11/7/16. (AFB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
