Omaro v. O'Connell et al
| Derrick R. Omaro |
| D. O'Connell, D. Borawski and Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program |
| 6:2016cv06052 |
| January 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Elizabeth A. Wolford |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
ORDER granting 48 defendants' motion to reopen discovery to continue plaintiff's deposition and to compel him to answer in a non-evasive manner. Counsel may continue plaintiff's deposition on these issues. The deposition shall occur by no later than 1/31/2018, and shall be limited to no more than 90 minutes. Although plaintiff may object to questions, he is reminded that he must nonetheless answer the questions directly and non-evasively. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 1/2/2018. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Derrick R. Omaro on 1/3/2018 to his address of record. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
66
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 55 is denied without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 10/11/2017. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Derrick R. Omaro on 10/11/2017 to his address of record. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
