Thomas v. Weitzman et al
| Tiffany Thomas |
| Raphael Weitzman and Weitzman Law Offices, LLC |
| BARON ASSOCIATES P.C., MARK L BRANDON, Richmond University Medical Center and The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C. |
| Weitzman Law Offices, LLC and Raphael Weitzman |
| 6:2016cv06222 |
| April 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
DECISION AND ORDER granting 6 Motion to Remand to State Court and dismissing third party action without prejudice; denying 20 Motion for Default Judgment as moot; denying 25 Motion for Default Judgment as moot; denying 33 Motion to Set Asi de Default as moot; denying 33 Motion for Discovery as moot; ; denying 8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as moot; denying 8 Motion to Disqualify Counsel; denying 8 Motion for Sanctions as moot, Plaintiff's motion to rem and [#6] is granted, and the action which was removed to this Court is remanded to New York State Supreme Court, New York County. The Third-Party Action is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). All other pending motions in this action are denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action.. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 12/1/16. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
