Boyd v. Petralis et al
| Nyjee L. Boyd |
| Vincent Petralis, Adam Geiger, Horan, Kennedy, Lopez and Latona |
| 6:2016cv06286 |
| May 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Wyoming |
| Elizabeth A. Wolford |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
DECISION & ORDER Boyd's request for the appointment of counsel 94 is denied without prejudice at this time. It is Boyd's responsibility to retain an attorney or continue with this lawsuit pro se. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 9/9/2019. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Nyjee L. Boyd on 9/9/2019 to his address of record. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER adopting 82 Report and Recommendations; denying 61 Motion to Amend or Correct. Signed by Hon. Elizabeth A. Wolford on 03/29/2019. (CDH) (A copy of this Order was mailed to Plaintiff)
|
|
Filing
38
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 18 25 37 is denied without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se; plaintiff's motion to compel and for sanctions 22 is denied. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 10/10/2017. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Nyjee L. Boyd on 10/11/2017 to his address of record. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
