Radford v. Crimi et al
| Barney J. Radford, Jr. |
| Charles Crimi, Josehp Crimi, Monroe County Public Defenders Office, Monroe County Conflict Defender, David Abbatoy and Monroe County District Attorney Office |
| 6:2016cv06441 |
| June 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Frank P. Geraci |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
DECISION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's request to proceed as a poor person (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED, (2) Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii), and (3) Plaintiff's motio n for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT.The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Any request to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal should be directed by motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and to close this case. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 3/23/17. (SCE)A copy of the Decision and Order and NEF have been mailed to the pro se Plaintiff.-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
