Howard v. Coburn et al
| Stanley L. Howard |
| James A. Coburn, Craig L. Rejman, Jason F. Stefaniak, Riley, Kiasley, Noeth, Dale Artus and Loverde |
| 6:2017cv06042 |
| January 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Cayuga |
| Elizabeth A. Wolford |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
DECISION AND ORDER: Discovery in this matter is closed with respect to all matters unrelated to Plaintiff's motion to compel (ECF No. 78 ), and with respect to the motion to compel, all discovery will be closed two weeks after Plaintiff has been provided the outstanding discovery. The parties are directed to inform the Court when the two-week period has expired. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Mark W. Pedersen on 1/27/2020. Copy of order mailed to plaintiff on 1/27/2020.(JB)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 78 Motion to Compel. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 9/24/19. (BJJ) (This order and NEF were mailed to pro se plaintiff.)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER denying 27 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 40 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 49 Motion for Hearing only insofar as it sets a pretrial conference; denying 64 Motion to Stay. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 2/4/19. (A copy of this entry and order were mailed to pro se plaintiff.) (BJJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
