Casaccia v. City of Rochester et al
| Michael Casaccia |
| City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Kevin Leckinger, Audrey DiPoala, Gary Wegman, Matthew Cushman, Joshua Hall, Amy Bauer, Rural/Metro Corporation, Robert Young and John Doe |
| 6:2017cv06323 |
| May 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Monroe |
| Michael A. Telesca |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
DECISION AND ORDER granting 93 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court awards Mr. Shields $67,135.00 as reasonable attorney fees and $490.28 in costs. The Clerk will enter judgement for Roth and Roth LLP in the amount of $67,625.28.SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Mark W. Pedersen on 9/15/21. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
|
Filing
83
DECISION AND ORDER: The City Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 58 is DENIED without prejudice to refiling upon the close of discovery. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 6/18/2020. (MFM)
|
|
Filing
82
DECISION AND ORDER denying 73 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 77 Motion to Compel; granting 77 Motion for Sanctions; granting 77 Motion for Protective Order. The City of Rochester's First Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 73) , is DENIED. Plaintiffs First Motion to Compel, its related motion for sanctions and the proposed protective order (ECF No. 77), is GRANTED. The City Defendant is directed to respond to Plaintiffs September 16, 2019, requests for admission and relate d interrogatories and requests for the production of documents. Further, the City Defendant is shall pay the cost of bringing the motion to compel and engaging in two appearances in relation to it. Accordingly, Plaintiffs counsel is directed to file a motion for costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, associated with his motion to compel and preparation of the motion for fees. Signed by Hon. Mark W. Pedersen on 6/1/20. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
71
DECISION AND ORDER granting 45 Motion to Compel; finding as moot 45 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; granting 45 Motion for Sanctions; denying 47 Motion to Bifurcate. SPECIFIC DEADLINES SET BY THE COURT ARE SET OUT IN THIS DECISION AND ORDER. Signed by Hon. Mark W. Pedersen on 3/3/20. (KAP)
|
|
Filing
43
DECISION AND ORDER denying as moot 30 Motion to Dismiss Case as Frivolous; denying as moot 30 Motion to Dismiss; granting 32 Motion to Strike and granting City Defendants leave to re-file their answer within seven (7) days of the date of entr y of this Decision and Order; denying 32 Motion to Amend or Correct the Complaint; denying 32 Motion for Sanctions; granting 32 Motion to Modify the Scheduling/Case Management Order to the extent that all discovery must be completed by September 30, 2019, and all dispositive motions must be filed by October 31, 2019; denying 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 8/14/19. (AFB)
|
|
Filing
17
DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Specifically, (1) the motion is granted with respect to all of Plaintiffs clai ms against the RPD, (2) Plaintiffs claims against the City based on the theory of supervisory liability are dismissed, and (3) Plaintiffs state law claims for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress are dismissed. The City Defend ants motion is denied in all other respects. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the Rochester Police Department as a named defendant in this case.. Signed by Hon. Michael A. Telesca on 1/8/18. (JMC)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
