Roland v. Hill et al
| Tyrice Roland |
| Hill, B. Long, S. Covell, Hillman and Bernd |
| 6:2017cv06524 |
| July 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Chemung |
| Frank P. Geraci |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
DECISION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 41 , is DENIED. By separate order, the Court will schedule a status conference to set a trial date. The parties should be prepared to address whether Covell will continue as a defendant in this action. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 8/16/19. A copy of this Decision and Order and Notice of Electronic Filing have been mailed to Plaintiff. (JO)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 36 Motion to Compel. Defendants shall search for and produce (1) titles and case numbers of federal civil lawsuits against defendants for excessive force; (2) copies of grievances against defendants for allegations of excessive force; (3) Directive No. 2111.. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 3/11/19. (This order and entry were mailed to pro se plaintiff.) (BJJ)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 38 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying 23 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A copy of this order and NEF have been mailed to pro se plaintiff. Signed by Hon. Jonathan W. Feldman on 9/24/18. (BJJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
