Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Western District Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Ramona Audrey Smith
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	6:2017cv06641
Filed:	September 14, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of New York
Office:	Rochester Office
County:	Livingston
Presiding Judge:	Charles J. Siragusa
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 13, 2020	Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. Attorney Smith's motion [ECF No. 27] is granted and Attorney Smith is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $18,023.50. Upon receipt of this award, Attorney Smith is directed to refund to Plaintiff the $5,561.28 in fees that Attorney Smith was previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Clerk is directed to close this case.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/13/20. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
June 19, 2019	Filing 22 DECISION AND ORDER granting 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF No. 12, is granted, and the Commissioners cross-motion, ECF No. 17, is de nied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an expedited rehearing. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 6/19/19. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Date Filed

Document Text

April 13, 2020

Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER granting 27 Motion for Attorney Fees. Attorney Smith's motion [ECF No. 27] is granted and Attorney Smith is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $18,023.50. Upon receipt of this award, Attorney Smith is directed to refund to Plaintiff the $5,561.28 in fees that Attorney Smith was previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Clerk is directed to close this case.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 3/13/20. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

June 19, 2019

Filing 22 DECISION AND ORDER granting 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF No. 12, is granted, and the Commissioners cross-motion, ECF No. 17, is de nied. This matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for an expedited rehearing. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 6/19/19. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramona Audrey Smith
Represented By:	Kenneth R. Hiller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?