Doe v. Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Hobart and William Smith Colleges
Case Number:
6:2017cv06762
Filed:
November 7, 2017
Court:
New York Western District Court
Office:
Rochester Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Geoffrey Crawford
Nature of Suit:
Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:
20:1681
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Doe v. Hobart and William Smith Colleges | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jane Doe | |
Represented By: | Stuart Bernstein |
Represented By: | Andrew Miltenberg |
Represented By: | Gabrielle M Vinci |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Hobart and William Smith Colleges | |
Represented By: | Michael E. Baughman |
Represented By: | Angelo Anthony Stio, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.