Russell v. Young et al
Da' Shawn Russell |
Young, Armstrong, Wurster, Dewald, Pundt, P. Greis, J. Thompson and A. Annucci |
6:2018cv06209 |
March 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
Rochester Office |
Erie |
Charles J. Siragusa |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 DECISION AND ORDER granting 34 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. ORDERED that Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment [ECF No. 34] is granted as to Russell's claims against defendants J. Thompson and A. Annucci; and it is furtherORDERED that the Clerk of Court terminate J. Thompson and A. Annucci as parties to this action.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/24/21. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Filing 18 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Default Judgment. The Court ORDERS, that the Clerk enter a default against all Defendants; and ORDERS, that Defendants file and serve by January 30, 2019, a motion to vacate the default; and ORDERS, Plaintiff to respond and serve his response to any such motion to vacate the default by February 13, 2019; and ORDERS, upon Defendants' failure to file and serve a motion to vacate the default by the date above, the Court will enter a default judgment against Defendants and set a date for a damages inquiry. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/25/19. (MWP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP- |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.