Easley v. Chautauqua County NY et al
| Stephen Easley |
| Chautauqua County NY, Chautauqua County Jail, Loverne, Slate, Chautauqua County District Attorney's and Patric Swanson |
| 6:2018cv06326 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Chautauqua |
| Charles J. Siragusa |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
DECISION AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is granted and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this action. The Court hereby certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C . § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith and leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals as a poor person is denied. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). Further requests to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis should be directed on motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in accordance with Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 5/20/20. Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this NEF and order to pro se plaintiff at 253 Hastings AvenueBuffalo, NY 14215 (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
