Cavico v. Steuben County Jail
| Joseph J. Cavico, Jr. |
| Steuben County Jail |
| 6:2018cv06329 |
| April 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Steuben |
| Elizabeth A. Wolford |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel 70 is denied without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 1654. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 1/5/2023. (KAH)This was mailed to: Plaintiff Joseph J. Cavico, Jr.
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER plaintiff's motion to compel and for an extension of time (Docket # 57 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Specifically, that portion of the motion which seeks to compel defendants' initial disclosures is denied as moot. In ac cordance with Rule 5.2(f)(3) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for the Western District of New York, defendants are directed, on or before March 4, 2022, to file their initial disclosures with the Court. Plaintiff's request for an extension of the deadline to amend the pleadings is granted, and the parties shall have until March 23, 2022, to file any motions seeking leave to amend the pleadings. All other dates in this Court's Amended Scheduling Order (Docket # 67 ) shall remain unchanged. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 2/17/22. (CMC)
|
|
Filing
59
DECISION & ORDER Plaintiffs requests for the appointment of counsel 52 55 are denied without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 165 4. Plaintiff's alternative request for a stay of the litigation pending his release 52 is denied. To the extent plaintiff requires an extension of any specific deadline, he is free to request that relief from the Court. Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 3/29/2021. (KAH)
|
|
Filing
35
DECISION & ORDER denying without prejudice plaintiff's requests for the appointment of counsel 28 34 . It is plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se.; finding as moot plaintiff� 39;s motion for a copy of the entire electronic case file 34 . Signed by Hon. Marian W. Payson on 10/31/2019. Copy of this Decision & Order sent by First Class Mail to plaintiff Joseph J. Cavico, Jr. on 10/31/2019 to his address of record. (KAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cavico v. Steuben County Jail | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph J. Cavico, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Steuben County Jail | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
