Weslowski, et al v. The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
| Virginia Weslowski and Benedict Weslowski |
| The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., and The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
| 6:2018cv06576 |
| August 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Western District of New York |
| Rochester Office |
| Albany |
| Frank P Geraci |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| E-Filing Notification: Clerk revised docket text of #5 to "AFFIRMATION in Response" to reflect correct filing event. (JHF) |
| Filing 5 AFFIRMATION in Response to #4 Order to Show Cause filed by The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Incident Witness Statement, #2 Exhibit B - Summons & Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Home Depot's Answer to Plaintiffs' Verified Complaint, #4 Exhibit D - Demand for Supplemental Statement of Damages, #5 Exhibit E - Home Depot's Combined Demands - Notice for Discovery and Inspection - Demand for a Verified Bill of Particulars, #6 Exhibit F - December 5, 2017 Good Faith Letter, #7 Exhibit G - March 5, 2018 Good Faith Letter, #8 Exhibit H - July 5, 2018 Good Faith Letter, #9 Exhibit I - August 3, 2018 Email to Plaintiffs' Counsel, #10 Exhibit J - Augst 6, 2018 Emails and Good Faith Letter, #11 Exhibit K - Petition for Removal of Action, #12 Exhibit L - August 7, 2018 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel stating Plaintiffs' are seeking other counsel)(Kelly, Meagan) Modified on 9/6/2018 (JHF). |
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: For the reasons stated, Defendant is hereby Ordered to Show Cause, in writing and by September 5, 2018, why this case should not be remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Monroe County, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 8/15/18. (KAJ)
|
| AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution.(KM) |
| Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (KM) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. identifying Corporate Parent Home Depot, Inc. for THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service - Rule 7.1 Disclosure)(Kelly, Meagan) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Notice of Removal, Affidavit of Service of Petition for Removal of Action by THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. (Kelly, Meagan) |
| E-Filing Notification regarding #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL. Filer to file should file an index of documents filed/ served in the state court action using the (continuation of exhibits )event. (KM) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants The Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from New York State Supreme Court, Monroe County, case number 2017-8132. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-3184529), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Exhibit C - Demand, #4 Exhibit D - Good Faith Letter, #5 Exhibit E - Good Faith Letter, #6 Exhibit F - Good Faith Letter, #7 Exhibit G - Email, #8 Exhibit H - Email)(Kelly, Meagan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
