Truong v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Vu Truong |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. |
6:2018cv06622 |
August 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the Western District of New York |
David G Larimer |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc..(Kelly, Meagan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Pollack on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Pollack, David) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Meagan M. Kelly on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (Kelly, Meagan) |
Filing 4 CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS to #1 Notice of Removal, CIVIL COVER SHEET. (Giacopelli, Michael) |
AUTOMATIC REFERRAL to Mediation The ADR Plan is available for download at http://www.nywd.uscourts.gov/alternative-dispute-resolution(TF) |
Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. (TF) |
Case assigned to Hon. David G. Larimer. Notification to Chambers of on-line civil opening. (TF) |
E-Filing Notification: #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL - Removal missing civil cover sheet and index. Action required: file index (pursuant to LR 81(3)(A)) and civil cover sheet using event CONTINUATION OF EXHIBITS. |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Home Depot, Inc. for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc... (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service - Rule 7.1 Disclosure)(Giacopelli, Michael) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Notice of Removal, Affidavit of Service of Petition for Removal of Action by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Giacopelli, Michael) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from Supreme Court - Monroe County, case number E2018003002. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0209-3200356), filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EX.A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit EX.B - Affidavit of Service - HD Office - Atlanta, GA, #3 Exhibit EX.C - Affidavit of Service - Secretary of State, #4 Exhibit EX.D - Consent to Change Attorney)(Giacopelli, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Truong v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vu Truong | |
Represented By: | William P. Smith, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Michael Giacopelli |
Represented By: | Meagan M. Kelly |
Represented By: | David M. Pollack |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.