Brown v. Whitaker et al
Petitioner: Rohan Brown
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls, Secretary Kristjen Nielsen and Matthew Whitaker
Case Number: 6:2018cv06841
Filed: November 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Frank P Geraci
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 9, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Barrie Moar on behalf of Kristjen Nielsen, Jeffrey Searls, Matthew Whitaker (Moar, Daniel)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER directing Respondent's answer and memorandum of law due or a motion to dismiss due within 45 days from the date of this order. Petitioner shall have 25 days upon receipt of answer (or motion to dismiss) to file a response. Clerk shall serve a copy of #1 petition and this order electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Western of New York at <. Signed by Hon. Frank P. Geraci, Jr. on 12/27/18. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (JHF)
December 28, 2018 Copy of #2 Order and #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus sent electronically via a Notice of Electronic Filing to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Western of New York at <. Copy of #2 Order mailed to pro se petitioner. (JHF)
December 3, 2018 Habe Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number ROC010970 (TF)
December 3, 2018 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Consent form, privacy notice and civil case timeline mailed to petitioner. (TF)
November 29, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Rohan Brown. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(TF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Whitaker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Secretary Kristjen Nielsen
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Whitaker
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rohan Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?