Diego v. Whitaker et al
Petitioner: Edwardo Aguirre Diego and Eduardo Aguirre Diego
Respondent: Jeffrey J. Searls, Thomas E. Feeley, Matthew Whitaker, Department of Homeland Security and Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Case Number: 6:2019cv06022
Filed: January 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Western District of New York
Presiding Judge: Charles J Siragusa
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2019 Filing 6 LETTER ORDER granting #5 Motion to Withdraw #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 2/7/19. Copy of this NEF and order mailed to pro se petitioner at Buffalo Federal Detention Facility. (KAP)-CLERK TO FOLLOW UP-
January 30, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw petition by Eduardo Aguirre Diego.(TF)
January 24, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Barrie Moar on behalf of Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security, Thomas E. Feeley, Jeffrey J. Searls, Matthew Whitaker (Moar, Daniel)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. It is hereby ordered that within 45 days of the date of this order, Respondents shall file and serve an answer; it is further ordered that in addition to the answer, Respondents shall serve a memo of law; it is further ordered that within 45 days of this order, instead of an answer, Respondents may serve a motion to dismiss. Petitioner shall have 25 days after receipt of Respondents' answer or motion to dismiss to file a written response. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/23/19. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 1/23/19. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (mailed a copy of this order to petitioner)(TF)
January 16, 2019 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number ROC011090 (TF)
January 16, 2019 E-Filing Notification: Docket entries modified to correct petitioners first name RE #1 PETITION and #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (TF)
January 9, 2019 Notice of Availability of Magistrate Judge: A United States Magistrate of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form (AO-85) is available for download at http://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/forms. Consent form, privacy notice and civil case timeline mailed to petitioner) (TF)
January 7, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eduardo Aguirre Diego.(TF) Modified on 1/16/2019 (TF).
January 7, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Eduardo Aguirre Diego against respondents.(TF) Modified on 1/16/2019 (TF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diego v. Whitaker et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeffrey J. Searls
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Thomas E. Feeley
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Whitaker
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Represented By: United States Attorney's Office (e-service)
Represented By: Daniel Barrie Moar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edwardo Aguirre Diego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eduardo Aguirre Diego
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?